June 2019

14Jun

The Great Pension Debate: Finding Common Ground

By Robert L Brown, Stephen Eadie In the never-ending debate about finding an optimal pension model, many proponents start the discussion at extreme ends of the pension model paradigm. At one extreme is a traditional, fully guaranteed defined-benefit (DB) pension plan. In this plan, all of the risks are born by the plan sponsor given that plans are fully funded. While such plans are growing rare today that is the starting point for many in this debate. At the...

June 14, 2019
Adequacy, Articles, Pension design, Slider-Left, , ,
Read more...

December 2017

30Dec

Reconsidering Revenue Sharing: Why Retirement Plan Sponsors Should Consider Breaking the Link between Investment and Plan Costs

By Marc Fandetti (P-Solve) Revenue sharing, the part (or “share”) of an investment manager’s expense that can be used to pay retirement plan costs, remains a common practice among defined contribution (DC) plan sponsors. This article looks at the reasons why revenue sharing arrangements should be reconsidered in light of increased legal scrutiny of the reasonableness of fees and the spirit of transparency motivating recently required disclosures to plan sponsors and participants. (more…)

December 30, 2017
Articles, Investing, , ,
Read more...

June 2017

11Jun

Public Pension Reform and the Takings Clause

By Michael B. Kent Jr. (Campbell University) Of the many current issues facing state and local governments, perhaps one of the most pressing is public pension reform. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, there are nearly 4,000 public pension systems in the United States, the vast majority (3,742) of which are administered by local governments. As of 2014, these systems had more than 19,000,000 members and more than 9,000,000 beneficiaries receiving periodic payments. But many of these systems are in...

June 11, 2017
Articles, Pension design, Regulation, System Sustainability, ,
Read more...